Interior-Point Method

In this post the interior point method described in [1] will be discussed. This algorithm solve the nonlinearly constrained optimization problem:

\begin{eqnarray} \min_x && f(x), \\
\text{subject to } && c_E(x) = 0,\\
&& c_I(x) \le 0, \end{eqnarray}

where $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ is a vector of unknowns, $f$ is called the objective function and $c_E$ and $c_I$ are vectorial functions used to delimit the feasible region.

A first version of this trust-region interior-point method was implemented during this week and the guiding principles behind the method will be explained in this post. Applications and test results will be left for future blog posts.

Barrier Problem

Introducing slack variables $s$ the general nonlinear programming problem can be rewritten as:

\begin{eqnarray} \min_x && f(x), \\
\text{subject to } && c_E(x) = 0,\\
&& c_I(x) + s = 0, \\
&& s \ge 0. \end{eqnarray}

The basic idea of the implemented interior-point method is to solve, instead of the above problem, the equality-constrained barrier problem: \begin{eqnarray} \min_{x, s} && f(x) - \mu \sum_{i} \ln (s_i), \\
\text{subject to } && c_E(x) = 0,\\
&& c_I(x) + s = 0, \end{eqnarray} for progressively smaller values of the barrier parameter $\mu$. The previously implemented Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) solver (described here) is used to successively solve those problems for $\mu \rightarrow 0$. The way of doing this efficiently described in [1] is not trying to solve the equality problem exactly, but rather to solve it inexactly with increasing accuracy as the problem gets closer to the solution.

The name “barrier problem” is due to the the fact the function $-\ln(s_i)$ increases to infinity as $s_i$ approach the value $0$, enforcing the condition $s>0$. By letting $\mu$ converge to zero, the sequence of solutions of the barrier problems converge to a solution point of the original nonlinear programming problem.

Outline of the Algorithm

The first order optimality conditions [2], p.321, for the barrier problem, guarantee that at a solution point $(x^*,~s^*)$ the following equations are satisfied: \begin{eqnarray} \nabla_x \mathcal{L}(x^*, s^*, \lambda_E, \lambda_I) &=& 0, \\
\nabla_s \mathcal{L}(x^*, s^*, \lambda_E, \lambda_I) &=& 0, \\
c_E(x^*) &=& 0,\\
c_I(x^*) + s^* &=& 0, \end{eqnarray} where $\nabla_x$ and $\nabla_s$ represents the first derivatives regarding, respectively, $x$ and $s$; and, for which $\mathcal{L}(x, s, \lambda_E, \lambda_I)$ represent the Lagrangian: \begin{equation} \mathcal{L}(x, s, \lambda_E, \lambda_I) = f(x) - \mu \sum_{i} \ln (s_i) + \lambda_E^T c_E(x) + \lambda_I^T (c_I(x) + s), \end{equation} and $\lambda_E$ and $\lambda_I$, the Lagrange multipliers.

Rather than a exact solution to the barrier problem, we will be contend with an approximation solution satisfying: \begin{eqnarray} \|\nabla_x \mathcal{L}(x, s, \lambda_E, \lambda_I)\| &<& \epsilon, \\
\|\nabla_s \mathcal{L}(x, s, \lambda_E, \lambda_I)\| &<& \epsilon, \\
\|c_E(x)\| &<& \epsilon,\\
\|c_I(x) + s\| &<& \epsilon \end{eqnarray}

Starting from a point $(x, s)$, for an initial barrier parameter $\mu$ and tolerance $\epsilon$ the algorithm repeats the following steps until a stop criteria:

  • Apply SQP trust-region starting from $(x, s)$ to find approximation solution $(x^{+}, s^{+})$ of the barrier problem (for an barrier parameter $\mu$), satisfying the tolerance $\epsilon$
  • Update solution $(x, s) \leftarrow (x^+, s^+)$, update the barrier solution $\mu \leftarrow 0.2\mu$ and the tolerance $\epsilon \leftarrow 0.2\epsilon$

Different strategies for decreasing $\mu$ and $\epsilon$ along the iterations are discussed in [3].

Final Comments

In this and in the two previous blog posts I tried to describe the main aspects of the algorithm I am implementing. In the first post the projected conjugate gradient method was described. This method solve the equality-constrained Quadratic Programming (QP) problem: \begin{eqnarray} \min_x && \frac{1}{2} x^T H x + c^T x + f, \\
\text{subject to } && A x = b. \end{eqnarray} The sequential solution of equality-constrained QP problems is the guiding principle for the SQP solver I described in the second post. This SQP solver is for equality-constrained problems of the form: \begin{eqnarray} \min_x && f(x), \\
\text{subject to } && c(x) = 0. \\
\end{eqnarray} And, in turn, is used as a substep of the interior-point method described in this post.


[1]    Richard H. Byrd, Mary E. Hribar, and Jorge Nocedal. “An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming.” SIAM Journal on Optimization 9.4 (1999): 877-900.

[2]   Jorge Nocedal, and Stephen J. Wright. “Numerical optimization” Second Edition (2006).

[3]     Richard H. Byrd, Guanghui Liu, and Jorge Nocedal. “On the local behavior of an interior point method for nonlinear programming.” Numerical analysis 1997 (1997): 37-56.

Written on July 7, 2017